There are many pros to choosing between silicone and saline implant for breast augmentation. Silicone is more pliable and less likely to rip, while saline implants are filled with saltwater. These implants also require a smaller incision, but they also tend to look less natural. If a woman has very little breast tissue, saline implants might not be a good choice.
Shaped implants replicate the natural teardrop shape of breasts
Shaped breast implants look naturaler than round implants. They have a thinner top, and then gradually fill out to the point below the nipple. This shape is a favorite among women who want a natural-looking enhancement. These implants can have cohesive silicone gel filled and are less likely cause ripples, folds, or creases than round ones.
Silicone implants are less likely to rippling
Although rippling can be seen with saline implant, it is much less evident with silicone implants. This is because silicone implants contain a cohesive filler. This gel closely resembles the skin and the natural breast tissue. Silicone implants are less likely to cause rippling, so these types of breast implants may be more suitable for thin or petite women.
Salinization implants are made with saltwater
The sterile saltwater solution used to fill the saline breast implants is sterile. Some implants are prefilled and some are filled during the operation. They are available in many sizes and shapes, and can be smooth or textured. They are FDA-approved to be used for breast augmentation. They are often used in breast reconstruction.
Gummy bear implants contain a more firm silicone gel
Gummy bear breast implants have a silicone gel that is firm and less likely to crack after surgery. The firm silicone gel, and teardrop shape of the implants help to keep their shape and reduce the possibility of capsular contracture. These implants are more firm than regular silicone and saline implants, and they have firmer outer shells.
For women over 22 years old, saline implants have been approved by the FDA
These breast implants are filled using sterilized saltwater. These are cheaper and more versatile that silicone implants, which are usually placed intraoperatively. Saline implants can also be tailored to the individual's needs. They are FDA-approved also for women aged 22 or older.
Saline implants have a lower risk of capsular contracture.
Research has shown that saline breast implants have a lower rate of capsule contraction than silicone breast implant. There are a few caveats in these findings. First, patients must agree that they will fund a reoperation. It is crucial that they do this in written informed consent documents. A second reason is that additional reoperations could make the condition worse and increase the likelihood of permanent tissue damage.